
Customer Reviews
4.8 out of 5
Based on 9 ratings:
1 of 1 found this helpful:
does what it is supposed to do!
about a year ago by Member #395282 verified purchaser
I tested at 1,6,25,50 and 100 ft cat 5e wire still delivers data.
Great for remote sensors
about a year ago by alpierce verified purchaser
I have been using RJ11 and RJ45 breakouts for running I2C sensors for a while, but always less than 2 or 3
meters. These will allow me to do much longer runs with solid data integrity. I’ve been thinking of doing
something similar and now SparkFun has saved me the trouble! The addition of the Qwiic connections is a nice
touch also. Great value in this product.
Extremely useful
about a year ago by Member #498156 verified purchaser
For fiddling around on the bench, the hot plug capability saves endless reboots - want to try a different qwiic
board? Unplug the RJ-45, plug in the new board, plug the RJ-45 back in and scan for it. I use a pair with a 1 m
Ethernet cable for just that purpose all the time.
I’m looking forward to using it for its other purpose (extending i2c/better noise immunity) as soon as I have a
need.
New product idea: combine a qwiic hat + 14589 (this) into one board.
fast and good
last year by Member #1465226 verified purchaser
item receive fast and good
I broke it
about 9 months ago by Member #278768 verified purchaser
Worked great using a 5 meter cable with a NodeMCU on one end and a 3-axis compass on the other end until
the compass got wet. The pga9615 leads shorted with green copper fuzz. Bought and applied some MG
conformal silicon coating to another board and so far it's working. Compass being used to report position of a
dual axis solar tracker.
Work Great, but Big for What They Are
about 5 months ago by Member #1510471 verified purchaser
Absolutely zero complaints about functionality. Dropped these in to a system where a 3m cable between a RPi
and a Teensy was providing "okay" I2C performance and now running at 400kHz without a single dropped
packet in 24 hours. My one and only complaint is that the board could be a lot smaller for what it's doing - I'd
guess 40% smaller without getting weird or complicated. But, that's only because my project has very tight
confines and every mm is a battle. For straight out long(ish) range I2C
performance, I am absolutely a believer. EDIT: On closer inspection, and in case SparkFun is reading - on the
next version of this board, it would be great if the 2 unused RJ45 pins were broken out somewhere on the
board. I got to them, but it's a little bit ugly!
5 star 7
4 star 2
3 star 0
2 star 0
1 star 0
Currently viewing all customer reviews.