ALL INTEANATIONAL RIGHTS RESERVED. BY AMP INCORPORATED COPYRIGHT 1997 AMP QUALIFICATION TEST REPORT AMP* CHAMP* Latch Low Profile Connectors 501-59 Rev. 0 x Qt oy nd Ye , es LY aX Product Specification: 108-6076 . ? CTL No.: CTL1250-025-006 Date: October 5, 1987 Classification: Unrestricted Prepared by: J. J. Edwards *Trademark of AMP Incorporated }______ Corporate Test Laboratory Harrisburg, Pennsylvaniate be ee et nm * Mon nom Ro Ro ho PRO Ro Ro RS Ro 8 + . oe w Ww OO Wo WW oo oo = R1250JE1 Ww O~ OU Whe WOOO BWP eee me 501-59 Table of Contents Introduction... 2... ccc cece cece eneen eee e ee eeneee Page PUYPOSE. cece cece cee errr ee cen rete eet ee teenies Page SCOPE. . cece eect erect ete e eee e eee e ence teens Page COMCTUSION...... eee e een eee eect et eeeaeetes Page Product Description... 0... cece ee eee eee ee Page Test Samples... cc. cece cee cee eee eee tee ees -,,.Page Qualification Test Sequence.........e cece eee Page Summary of Testing....-.ececevccccccccceetcence Page Examination of Product............ csc eee sae eee Page Termination Resistance, Dry Circuit.........00. Page Mating Force... 2... cece cee eee eee Page Durability... .. ccc cee eee cee tee e eee eee te eens Page Unmating Force... ... ccc cee eee eee een eee nea Page Vibrations. ccc cn cee ce ee eee naee babe e cee n eee Page Physical SHOCK. ..... 0... ee ec ce cee eee eee ennes Page Insulation Resistance......... cece eee eee ee ene Page Dielectric Withstanding Voltage.............--- Page Humidity-Temperature Cycling........... sec eeee Page Thermal SHOCK... 02. cee cece cee cette e eee eens Page Industrial Mixed Flowing Gas.........eee ee ee ees Page Test Methods......... occ e een euservernasessens Page Examination of Product.........--...e ee ee eee ee Page Termination Resistance, Dry Circuit............ Page Mating Force........ ee ee eee tee eee ena eeee Page Durability... ccc cece ee tet e eee ee neee Page Unmating Force... ... cece ec eee eet eee eee Page Vibration... cee ce cee eee ee eee ten cee Page Physical SHOCK. . 0... ccc cee cece eee ee ee teens Page Insulation Resistance... ... cc cece eee tees Page Dielectric Withstanding Voltage................ Page Humidity-Temperature Cycling.................06 Page Thermal Shock... 0... cc cece eee eee cence enna Page Industrial Mixed Flowing GaS......cseee enc eenes Page Validation......... beer teeansenene se ee wens eene Page POR RO ee ee a) AMAaAaaaAga@hMa a WwW OOO ASS SS om mn501-59 AMP AMP INCORPORATED HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17105 PHONE: 717-564-0100 FWX: 510-657-4110 CORPORATE TEST LABORATORY Qualification Test Report AMP CHAMP Latch Low Profile Connectors Part Numbers 553602-1 and 553603-1 |r Introduction ee 1. Purpose Testing was conducted to measure the performance of AMP CHAMP Latch Low Profile Connectors when tested to the requirements of AMP Product Specification 108-6076, Rev. 0. 1.2 Scope This report covers electrical and mechanical performance of AMP CHAMP Latch Low Profile Connectors made by the Communications Products Division of the Signal Transmission Products Group. They were submitted to the Components and Assemblies Group Laboratory on January 24, 1986. Testing was performed between February 13, 1986 and November 6, 1986 1,3 Conclusion AMP CHAMP Latch Low Profile Connectors meet the electrical and mechanical performance requirements of Product Specification 108-6076, Rev. 0.501-59 Page 2 va an on Product Description AMP CHAMP Latch connectors provide a means of mass terminating 0.050 inch centerline ribbon cable without prestripping of wire. Housings are made of self-extinguishing thermoplastic material. Contacts are copper alloy with gold over nickel plating. The cover is secured to the connector body with two latching tabs. Connectors are made in four sizes, 14, 24, 36 and 50 positions. They can terminate ribbon cable with 26 through 30 AWG solid wire and 28 AWG stranded wire. Test Samples Connectors were taken randomly from current production. Test groups 1, 2 and 3 each consisted of two fifty position connector halves wired with 28 AWG cable. All fifty circuits in each connector were tested in test groups 1 and 3; twenty five circuits in each connector were tested in test group 2. Test groups 4, 5 and 6 consisted of two unmated 50 position connectors wired with 26, 28 and 30 AWG solid and 28 AWG stranded cable respectively. Two pairs of mated 50 position connectors were wired with 28 AWG solid cable. Sample identification for Test Groups 4, 5, and 6 is: Samples 1 & 2 were wired with 26 solid and were unmated. Samples 3 & 4 were wired with 28 solid and were unmated. Samples 5 & 6 were wired with 30 solid and were unmated. Samples 7 & 8 were wired with 28 stranded and were unmated. Samples 9 & 10 were wired with 28 solid and were mated. Samples tested were: Part No. 553602-1 Fifty Position Plug Assembly Part No. 553603-1 Fifty Position Receptacle Assembly Qualification Test Sequence Test Group Test or Examination l 2 3 4 5 6 Test Sequence (a) Examination of Product I 1 1 1 1 ] Termination Resistance, 28 2.5 24 2.4 2.4 Ory Circuit , , , , ; Dielectric Withstanding 3 Yoltage Insulation Resistance 2 Vibration 3 Physical Shock 4 Mating Force Unmating Force , Durability 5 Thermal Shock 3 Humidity - Temperature 3 Cycling Industrial Mixed Flowing 3 Gas uw ~~ (a) Numbers show the sequence in which the tests are performed.Mm * -_ nm N 501-59 Page 3 Summary of Testing Examination of Product - All Groups All connectors submitted for testing were selected from production lots. They were inspected and accepted by the Product Assurance Department of the Communications Products Division, and were delivered to the C&A Group laboratory on January 23, 1986. Termination Resistance, Dry Circuit - Groups 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 All samples met the requirements of the specification. The initial termination resistance of the contacts in each test group were as follows. Resistance in milliohms Test Sample Specified Group Number Min. Max. Mean Maximum 1 15. 1 19, 2 16. 19. mal ~] row 22.0 22.0 Mm ha sO wn Ooo mN ws Sm Om wn O~4 OO WO WPOoOOC HASH _ ns ooocecoece ao a" a er501-59 Page 4 Termination Resistance, Dry Circuit Cont7d. Test Sample Group Number Min. 6 owon~n gain ewe he He HOP POE HH f~ Ow Se fe He Max. en on oo wo on oh 0 0 eo o4 8 we ee hel mag Ponwn~ Hw Hh Mean ee Ww ss oon a OF sd HW OM hh ono & Specified Maximum 12. 12. 12. l2. 12. 12. 12. 12. 22. 22. ooomoooooo0eoe The change in resistance (AR) between the initial and subsequent termination resistance measurements were as follows: Test Sample Specified Group Number Min. Max. Mean Maximum AR After Durability: 1 1 -0.19 1.70 0.64 10.0 2 -9.09 1,07 0.22 10.0 After Physical Shock: 2 1 -0.24 2.18 0.29 10,0 2 -0.39 1.44 0.34 10.9 After Humidity-Temperature Cycling: 4 1 -0,09 -0.03 -0.06 5.0 2 -0.09 -0.02 ~0.06 5.0 3 -0.10 -0.03 -Q.07 5.0 4 -0.10 -0.04 -0.07 5.0 5 -0.15 -0.10 -0.13 5.0 6 -0.20 -0.02 -0.09 5.0 7 -0.58 2.08 0.06 15.0 8 -0.32 1.57 0.01 15.0 9 -1.63 1,87 0.10 10.9 10 -1.53 1.86 0.00 10.0 After Thermal Shock: 5 ] -0.95 0.07 -0.01 5.0 2 -0.08 0.00 -0.03 5.0 3 -0.50 0.84 0.08 5.0 4 -0.05 0.08 -0,02 5.0 5 -0.19 -0.07 -0.13 5.0 6 -0.31 0.17 -0.24 5.0 7 -0.14 0.38 0.05 15.0 8 -0.22 0.35 -0.01 15.0 9 -0.39 2.53 0.62 10.0 10 -0.06 1.54 0.46 10.0nN . Ne 501-59 Page 5 Termination Resistance, Dry Circuit, Contd Test Sample Specified Group Number Min. Max. Mean Maximum AR After Industrial Mixed Flowing Gas: 6 1 0.02 0.08 0.05 5.0 2 0.02 0.09 0.03 5.0 3 -0,08 -0.02 -0.03 . 5.0 4 0.05 0.08 0.06 5.0 5 -0.09 0.00 -0.05 5.0 6 0.03 0.09 0.05 5.0 7 -0.24 1.10 0.16 15.0 8 -0.05 1.00 0.12 15.0 9 -2.06 0.29 -0.18 10.0 10 0.09 0.74 0.22 10.0 Mating Force - Group 1 All samples met the requirements of the specification. All readings are in pounds. Specified Reading Sample No. Force Maximum Initial 1 23.0 35 2 22.5 35 Final ] 27.0 . 35 2 26.5 35 Durability - Group 1 After 200 mating and unmating cycles, there was no visible wear or damage. Samples met the mating and unmating force and termination resistance requirements of the product specification. Unmating Force - Group 1 All samples met the requirements of the specification. All readings are in pounds. Specified Reading Sampte No. Force Minimum Initial 1 14.0 10 2 10.0 10 Final 1 18.0 10 2 11.5 10501-59 Page 6 nN an 2.11 Vibration - Group 2 During vibration testing there were no discontinuities greater than one microsecond. Following vibration, there were no cracks, breaks or loose parts. Physical Shock- Group 2 During physical shock testing there were no discontinuities greater than one microsecond. Following physical shock, there were no cracks, breaks or loose parts. Insulation Resistance - Group 3 The insulation resistance was greater than the 5000 megohms required. The minimum value was 9.9X10 megohms. Dielectric Withstanding Voltage - Group 3 There was no voltage breakdown or flashover when 1000 V ac was impressed on adjacent contacts. Humidity-Temperature Cycling - Group 4 After ten days of humidity-temperature cycling there was no damage to the connectors. Thermal Shock - Group 5 2.12 | ow Bh Connectors were exposed to 5 cycles of thermal shock between the temperatures of -65C and 90C. There was no damage to the samples. Industrial Mixed Flowing Gas - Group 6 Connectors were exposed to a Class II environment for 20 days. There was no damage to the connectors. Test Methods Examination of Product The product drawing and inspection plan were used to examine the samples. They were examined visually, dimensionally and functionally. Termination Resistance, Dry Circuit Termination resistance was measured on all contacts in each test group. A four terminal resistance measuring station was used. Current during the test was maintained at 50 milliamperes with 50 millivolts maximum open circuit voltage.7 co o 501-59 Page 7 Mating Force Connector halves were mounted in free floating fixtures. The force required to mate them for a distance of 0.095 inch from the initial point of contact was measured. The speed of mating was 0.5 inch per minute. Durability Connectors were mated and unmated 200 times at a rate 150 cycles per hour, maximum. The mating force fixturing was used, Unmating Force The force needed to unmate the connectors was measured. The mating force fixturing was used. Vibration Mated connectors were subjected to vibration having sinusoidal motion. The amplitude was either 0.06 inch, double amplitude or 15 gravity units peak, whichever was less. The vibration frequency was varied between the limits of 10 and 2000 Hz and returned to 10 Hz in 20 minutes, This cycle was performed 12 times in each of three mutually perpendicular planes. The connectors were monitored for discontinuities greater than one microsecond, using a current of 100 milliamperes in the monitoring circuit. Physical Shock Mated connectors were physically shocked. The parameters were a sawtooth waveform of 100 gravity units for a duration of six milliseconds. Three shocks in each direction were applied along the three mutually perpendicular planes for a total of 18 shocks. The connectors were monitored for discontinuities greater than one microsecond, using a current of 100 milliamperes in the monitoring circuit. Insulation Resistance Insulation resistance was measured between adjacent contacts of mated connectors. A voltage of 500 V de was applied for two minutes and the insulation resistance was measured. Dielectric Withstanding Yoltage A test voltage of 1000 V ac was applied between adjacent contacts of mated connectors for one minute.501-59 Mated and unmated connectors were exposed to a ten day humidity-temperature cycle. A 24 hour period consisted of cycling the temperature between 25C and 65C twice while holding the humidity at 95%. A cold shock was performed on them during five of the first nine days. The cold shock was Mated and unmated connectors were subjected to five cycles of thermal shock. The temperature extremes were -65C and +85C. Fach cycle consisted of 30 minutes at each temperature. Transition between temperatures was less than five minutes. Page 8 3.10 Humidity-Temperature Cycling -10C for three hours. 3.11 Thermal Shock 3.12 Industrial Mixed Flowing Gas Mated and unmated connectors were exposed to 20 days in the industrial mixed flowing gas chamber. Class IJ exposure is defined as a temperature of 30C and a relative humidity of 70%. prottutants are Clo at 10 ppb, NO at 200 ppb, and Ha$ at 10 ppb.501-59 Page 9 Validation Prepared by: WA eine! > {0/5 / #7 dy } Edwards Supervisor, Design Assurance Testing Corporate Test Laboratory Reviewed by: Senos oF Ae = / TT {29 ames R. Kohout nager, Product Testing Corporate Test Laboratory Approved by: Er Ralston Manager, Product Assurance Communications Products Division